Bìol. Tvarin, 2018, volume 20, issue 2, pp. 51–57


Kh. Kurta1, O. Malysheva1, V. Babenko2, V. Spyrydonov3
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1Ukrainian laboratory of quality and safety of agricultural products,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
7 Mashynobudivnykiv str., Chabany village, Kyiv region, 08162, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

2OJSV “Chernihiv Fish Industry”,
Zhavynka village, Chernigiv region, 15583, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

3Institute of Veterinary Medicine NAAS of Ukraine,
30 Donetska str., Kyiv 03151, Ukraine

Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) as one of representatives of sturgeon fish attracts a particular attention among cultivating species due to its high biological value, taste and dietary qualities of its meat. Investigation of the population-genetic structure of paddlefish is important for monitoring the effectiveness of breeding works in the artificial reproduction of this species.

The purpose of our work was to determine the peculiarities of the genetic structure of paddlefish of the Chernihiv population by microsatellite DNA markers.

In the studies the PCR method by the following microsatellite DNA markers Psp12, Psp21, Psp26, Psp28 was used. The amplification products were denatured with formamide (Sigma, USA) and separated by capillary electrophoresis on the genetic analyzer, ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

As a result of genetic analysis, 22 allelic variants were identified in Chernigov paddlefish population. The Psp28 (8 allelic variants) was the most polymorphous among studied loci, the Psp21 locus (3 allelic variants) was the least polymorphic. The mean number of alleles per locus (Na) was 6.25. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) ranged from 0,457 (Psp21) to 0,943 (Psp28) and 0,550 (Psp21) to 0,711 (Psp28) with average values of 0,750 and 0,640, respectively. The polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.482 (locus Psp21) to 0.666 (locus Psp28), the mean PIC was 0.584. The mean rate of power of exclusion (PE) was PE=0.559 and ranged from 0.153 to 0.884 for Psp21 and Psp28 loci, respectively. Based on our population-genetic calculations, it was found that the paddlefish population is characterized by a high level of polymorphism by studied microsatellite DNA markers (Psp12, Psp21, Psp26, Psp26), and the genetic structure of the population has predominance of heterozygous genotypes over homozygous. These results can be recommended for fish breeding farms for practical application and implementation of molecular-genetic certification of the paddlefish’s broodstock.


  1. Carter M. J., Milton I. D. An inexpensive and simple method for DNA purifications on silica particles. Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, vol. 21, pp. 1044–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.4.1044
  2. Heist E. J, Mustapha A. Genetic Structure in Paddlefish Inferred from DNA Microsatellite Loci. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2008, vol. 137, is. 3, pp. 909–915.
  3. Heist E. J., Nicholson E. H., Sipiorski J. T., Keeney D. B. Microsatellite markers for the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula). Conservation Genetics, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272414957
  4. Kaczmarczyk D., Luczynski M., Kolman R. Assemblage of spawning pairs of farmed American paddlefish based on their individual genetic profiles — a new tool in managing of the broodstock’s gene pool. Summary document of Aquaculture Europe, 2008, pp. 36–37.
  5. Kalinowski S. T., Taper M. L., Marshall T. C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 2007, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x
  6. Kurta K., Malysheva O., Grishyn B., Getia A., Shynkarenko L., Spyrydonov V. Identification of allelic variants of microsatellite DNA paddlefish (Polyodon spathula). Biological Resources and Nature Management, 2017, vol. 9, no. 5–6. Available at: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Bio/article/view/9590 (in Ukrainian)
  7. Kurta K. M., Malysheva O. O., Spyrydonov V. G. Contemporary state and prospects of research of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) genetic structure (review). Scientific reports of NULES of Ukraine, 2016, no. 6 (63), 25 p. Available at: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/issue/view/308. (in Ukrainian)
  8. Kurta K., Malysheva O., Spyrydonov V. Development of multiplex PCR for genetic analysis of paddlefish populations (Polyodon spathula Walbaum, 1792). Fishery science of Ukraine, 2017, vol. 4, no. 42, pp. 65–74. (in Ukrainian)
  9. Kurta K., Malysheva O., Spyrydonov V. Optimization of polymerase chain reaction’s conditions for studies of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) microsatellite DNA. The Animal Biology, 2017, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 56–63. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15407/animbiol19.02.056
  10. Malysheva O., Spyrydonov V., Mosnyagul K., Shynkarenko L., Andreev I. Intraspecific polymorphism of the microsatellite DNA of Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii brandt). Fishery science of Ukraine, 2016, no. 4 (38), pp. 123–130. (in Ukrainian)
  11. Marshall T. C., Slate J., Kruuk L. E., Pemberton J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. ecol., 1998, pp. 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x
  12. May B., Krueger C. C., Kincaid H. L. Genetic variation at microsatellite loci in sturgeon: primers sequence homology in Acipenser and Scaphirhynchus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1997, no. 54, pp. 1542–1547. https://doi.org/10.1139/f97-061
  13. Mims S. Aquaculture of Paddlefish in the United States. Aquat. Living Resour., 2001, vol. 14, pp. 391−398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(01)01137-8
  14. Peakall R. Smouse P. E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2006, vol. 6, pp. 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
  15. Pikitch E., Doukakis P., Lauck L., Chakraborty P., Erickson D. L. Status, trends and management of sturgeon and paddlefish fisheries . Fish Fish, 2005, vol. 6, pp. 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00190.x
  16. Sharylo Y., Vdovenko N., Fedorenko M., Gerasymchuk V., Neboga G., Haydamaka L., Zhakun I. Contemporary aquaculture: from theory to practice. A practical guide. Kyiv, Prostobook, 2016, 149 p. (in Ukrainian)
  17. Tretiak O. M., Hrytsyniak I. I., Tarasiuk S. I. Using DNA markers for studying the genetic structure of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula (Walb.)) brood stocks. Fisheries science of Ukraine, 2012, vol. 4, pp. 117–120. (in Ukrainian)
© 2016 Institute of Animal Biology