Bìol. Tvarin, 2018, volume 20, issue 1, pp. 54–59


M. R. Kozak1, Yu.V. Martyn1, A. V. Oliynyk1, N. V. Kuzmina1, D. D. Ostapiv1, O. L. Pajuk2,
N. E. Mitina2, O.
 S. Zaichenko2, V. V. Vlizlo1
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1Institute of Animal Biology NAAS,
38 V. Stus str., Lviv 79034, Ukraine

2National University “Lviv Polytechnic”,
2 Sviatoho Yura sq., Lviv 79013, Ukraine

Vaccination is the best biomedical approach in avoiding diseases. Proteins and peptides purified from microorganisms or synthesized chemically are weakly antigenic and need adjuvant to provide strong immune responses. Many substances with adjuvant properties have been discovered, however, only aluminum compounds stay traditionally in clinical use. The aim of this study was to evaluate biological influence on mice after immunization with a polymer of acrylic acid with adjuvant properties.
The polymer was synthesized on the basis of glycidyl methacrylate, acrylic acid, triethylene glycol methacrylate and butyl acrylate. Histomorphology of the liver, kidney and spleen of white mice after subcutaneous administration of polymer or aluminum hydroxide was investigated. It has been established that the polymer and aluminum hydroxide did not cause changes in parenchymal organs of white mice. The structure of organs was preserved, no pathological changes were revealed.The activities of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase and glutation reductase (GP) at the application of adjuvants were studied. Immunization of mice with aluminum hydroxide showed an increase in the activity of SOD in the kidneys by 1.5 times (P<0.01), catalase in liver on 8 % (P<0.05), and GP in kidney on 30.6 % (P<0.001). Polymer based on acrylic acid caused a decrease of SOD activity in the liver by 1.78 times (P<0.01), and an increase of catalase activity on 10.5 % (P<0.05). At the same time, the activity of antioxidant enzymes in the spleen and kidneys of animals after the injection of the polymer did not differ from the control group.


  1. Bal S. M., Ding Z., Kersten G. F., Jiskoot W., Bouwstra J. A. Micronidle-based transcutaneous immunization in mice with N-trimethyl Chitosan adjuvanted Diphteria Toxoid Formulations. Pharm. Res., 2010, vol. 9, no. 27, pp. 1837–1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0182-y
  2. Brunner R., Jensen-Jarolim E., Pali-Schöll I. The ABC of clinical and experimental adjuvants. Immunol. Lett., 2010, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2009.10.005
  3. Chelpanova I. V. Interaction of the prooxidant antioxidant status and destructive changes in lungs with experimental pneumony. Ukrainian morphological almanac, 2014, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 95–98. (in Ukrainian)
  4. Histology with the basics of histological technology. Ed. by V. P. Pishak. Kyiv, Kondor., 2008, 400 p. (in Ukranian)
  1. Kaba S., Brando C., Guo Q., Mittelholzer C., Ramon S., Tropel D., Aebi U., Burkhard P., Lanar D. E. A nonadjuvanted polypeptide nanoparticles vaccine confers long-lasting protection against Rodent malaria. Immunol., 2009, vol. 11, no. 183, pp. 7268–7277. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901957
  2. Kozak M. R., Oliynyk A. V., Zaichenko O. S., Vlizlo V. V. Adjuvant properties of polymer based on acrylic acid. Ukr. Biochem. J., 2013, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 69–73. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj85.03.069
  3. Laboratory methods of research in biology, livestock and veterinary medicine. A reference book. Ed. by V. V. Vlizlo. Lviv, Spolom, 2012, 761 p. (in Ukrainian)
  4. Lindblad E. B. Aluminium adjuvants — in retrospect and prospect. Vaccine, 2004, vol. 22, no. 27–28, pp. 3658–3668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.032
  5. Martyn C. N., Barker D. J., Osmond C., Edwardson J. A., Harris E. C., Lacey R. F. Geographical relation between Alzheimer’s disease and aluminum in drinking water. Lancet, 1989, vol. 1, no. 8629, pp. 59–62.
  1. Nicholls E. F., Madera L., Hancock R. Immunomodulators as adjuvants for vaccine and antimicrobial therapy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 2010, vol. 1213, pp. 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05787.x
  2. Oliynyk A. V., Kozak M. R., Zaichenko O. S., Vlizlo V. V. Lipid hydroperoxides and TBA-active products in mouse organs at the action of adjuvants — polymer MG-4 and aluminum hydroxide. The Animal Biology, 2012, vol. 14, no. 1–2, pp. 174–178. (in Ukrainian)
  3. Peek L. J., Middaugh C. R., Berkland C. Nanotechnology in vaccine delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2008, vol. 60, pp. 915–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2007.05.017
  4. Spazierer D., Skhavara H., Dawid D. T-helper 2 biased de novo immune response to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin in humans. Clin. Exp. Allergy, 2009, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03177.x
  5. Sybirna N. O., Mayevska O. M., Barska M. L. Research of certain biochemical indices under conditions of oxidative stress. Educational and methodical manual. Lviv, Publishing Centre of Lviv National University, 2006, 60 p. (in Ukrainian)

Download full text in PDF format

© 2016 Institute of Animal Biology