Bìol. Tvarin, 2016, volume 18, issue 4, pp. 58–65                                     http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/animbiol18.04.058

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF SEROLOGY MONITORING OF CIRCOVIRUS INFECTION IN SWINE IN UKRAINE FOR THE PERIOD 2013–2015

D. Masiuk1, A. Kokarev1, S. Koliada1, I. Furda2, V. Baidaliuk3, N. Sytyuk3

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1 Scientific Research Centre of Biosafety And Environmental Control Agro-Industrial Complex
of Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian And Economic University,
25 Serhiya Yefremova str., Dnipro 49600, Ukraine

2National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
15 Heroiv Oborony str., Kyiv 03041, Ukraine

3Institute of Veterinary Medicine of Ukraine,
30 Donetska str., Kyiv 03151, Ukraine

The article presents the results of serological monitoring research among domestic pigs in the regions of Ukraine regarding circovirus infection during 2013–2015 years.

The aim was to assess the immune status of domestic pigs in different regions of Ukraine regarding the circovirus infection.

Research has been conducted during the 2013–2015 years. During this time, 1,889 blood serum samples from 109 farms located in areas of 96 administrative districts of regions of Ukraine have been studied. The presence of postinfectious specific antibodies against circovirus type II of blood serum in domestic pigs was determined by ELISA using test kits «Swinecheck® PCV2 IgG» («Biovet», Canada), «Ingezim Circovirus IgG/IgM® 11.PCV.K2» («INGENASA», Spain).

By the results of serological monitoring the mapping analysis to seroprevalence of domestic swine to circovirus type II in regions of Ukraine has been conducted.

The results of research of blood serum from domestic pigs for detecting specific antibodies against circovirus second type of ELISA suggest that the overall rate of seroprevalence is 67.6 %, and in different years the number of positive samples compared to number of all studied samples increases — namely 62.4 %, 67.0% and 83.29% in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

The highest indices of porcine seroprevalence to circovirus type II have been found in Kherson (95.2 %) and Chernihiv (93.42 %) regions.

The revised data of serological studies suggest that the circovirus pathogen is circulating in swine herd in Ukraine.

Keywords: DOMESTIC PIG, CIRCOVIRUS TYPE II, ELISA, ANTIBODIES, SEROLOGICAL MONITORING

1. Finsterbusch T., Mankertz A. Porcine circoviruses — small but powerful. Virus Res., 2009, 143, pp. 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2009.02.009
2. Gillespie J., Opriessnig T., Meng X., Pelzer K., Buechner-Maxwell V. Porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine circovirus-associated disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med., 2009, vol. 23, pp. 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0389.x
3. Grechukhin A. N. Porcine circovirus infection and its specific prevention. Veterinary, 2010, no. 10, 3, pp. 8–11. (in Russian)
4. Janke B. Porcine circovirus as a cause of reproductive problems. Case report: Proc Iowa Vet Med Assoc. Ames, Iowa, 2000, 101 p.
5. Kiupe M., Stevenson G. M., Mital S. K. Circovirus-like viral associated disease in weaned pigs. Vet. Pathol., 1998, vol. 4 (35), no. 4, pp. 303–307.
6. Kukushkin S. A., Okovity T. V. Distribution of Lawsoniain tracellularis, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and PCV-2 in pig farms of Russia. Veterinary medicine, 2012, no. 10, pp. 20–22 (in Russian)
7. Malogolovkin A. S., Nadtochey D. V., Kolbasov G. A. Allocation porcine circovirus type 2 from piglets with the syndrome of multisystem depletion piglets. Vet. doctor, 2009, no. 2, pp. 27–30. (in Russian)
8. Masyuk D. M., Kokarev A. V., Movkalova H. S., Kolyada S. H., Shatalov S. A. Features of diagnosis the PCV2 using molecular diagnostic methods. Scientific and technical bulletin Research Center biosafety and environmental control resources AIC. Dnipropterovsk, 2014, vol. 4, no. 2. Available at: http://biosafety-center.com/2014-%D1%82-2-%E2%84%962
9. Pittman J. S. Reproductive failure associated with porcine circovirus type 2 in gilts. J. Swine Health Prod., 2008, 16, pp. 144–148.
10. Prudnikov S. I., Shkrylev A. N., Dimov S. K., Duhovskiy A. A., Andreev L. B., Kolobov A. I. Epizootiological and economic importance of porcine circovirus infection and its prevention in modern conditions of industrial pig-breeding. Veterinary Kuban, 2010, no. 5, pp. 13–15. (in Russian)
11. Sateen T. A. Porcine circovirus infection. Vladimir, printing base of FGU 3, ARRIAH, 2003, 100 p. (in Russian)
12. Segales J., Allan G., Domingo M. Porcine Circovirus Diseases. Diseases of swine, 9th Ed., 2006, pp. 299–307.
13. Segales J. Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infections: clinical signs, pathology and laboratory diagnosis. Virus Res., 2012, 164, pp. 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.10.007
14. Shkaeva M. A., Tsibezov V. V., Verhovskiy O. A. ELISA for detection of antibodies to porcine circovirus type 2. Veterinary medicine, 2005, no. 9, pp. 20–23. (in Russian)

Download full text in PDF format

© 2016 Institute of Animal Biology

Search